I’m so glad that knowledgeable people take the time to upload and comment upon images of Glasgow’s relatively recent past. Otherwise, images like this would be meaningless:

Buchanan Street station area in Cowcaddens, Glasgow

It’s taken around the Cowcaddens area. The area as it’s shown here is totally unrecognisable from its current state: apart from the Hamish Wood and George Moore buildings of what subsequently became Glasgow Caledonian University in the centre-left and the distant high flats, very little of what you see here still exists.

I can’t find a modern photo taken from the same angle, but this shot gives you some idea of how the area immediately between the GCU campus and the towerblock on the left now looks.

This and other gems of past and present documentary at the Urban Glasgow site.

Some links to recent articles with an economic theme. Hopefully they’ll help you get through Christmukkah:

• Inside the world’s most annoying economic crisis
• The future of cities: why Glasgow and Edinburgh should consider a joint future
• A world enslaved: how slavery thrives in the modern global economy
• How opium can save Afghanistan
• Edward Hugh’s impressive economic analyses of Europe’s prospects in the next few months. Essential reading for those interested in the new EU-25/27 entrant states. My woeful understanding of macroeconomics doesn’t allow me to evaluate these fully, but they do seem thorough.

I came in to work happy this morning. Firstly, because it’s a beautiful day. And secondly because of this.

1. There was a ned on the bus today with extraordinarily varied (and sometimes quite good) taste in music. Normally there’s someone at the back playing Happy Hardcore or something really loud on their mobile.

This particular gentleman started off with something like that, and then embarked on a musical odyssey which took in Mellow Yellow by Donovan, I Fought The Law by the Clash, a couple of The Jam songs and finally (and it had all been going so well) I Predict A Riot by the Kaiser Chiefs.

2. There’s something recognisable in this scene from Garth Marenghi’s Darkplace (hilarious series btw):

This is a story I wrote for publication in my University’s student newspaper. It went out in the 9th November edition of the Strathclyde Telegraph (which went out today, due to late printing). It was edited for publication somewhat but I’ve chosen to publish the version which went to press here in the interests of consistency…

And no, the title/headline is nothing to do with me – so send your groans/complaints elsewhere!

A leaked draft memorandum has revealed the UK government gave serious consideration to asking senior university staff to pass on information regarding Muslim or “Asian-looking” students to the security services. This approach appears to be the latest in a series of faltering efforts aimed at tackling ‘extremism’ in Muslim communities, for which the government believes campuses are “fertile recruiting grounds”.

The memo, which is not publicly available but was obtained by The Guardian, calls for university staff to cede information to Special Branch units of regional police forces regarding the activities of Muslim societies on campus.

It has provoked outrage among students, university staff and among Muslim communities.

Ousman Sadiq, a Masters student on Strathclyde’s Computer and Electronic Systems course described the measures as “a largely unhelpful bit of guidance that will end up only making Muslims feel more oppressed, while still not being a deterrent to those who tend towards an extremist viewpoint”.

NUS National President Gemma Tumelty criticised the plans as likely to introduce a “McCarthy-like atmosphere of suspicion between students and lecturers”, and the Universities and Colleges Union joint secretary Paul Mackney warned that the memo had the implication of “blurring the boundaries of what is illegal and what is possibly undesirable”. “UCU members have a pivotal role in building trust – these proposals, if implemented, would make it all but impossible”. The Australian Vice Chancellors Committee (AVCC) even went so far as to issue a press release to reassure students studying in Australia that such measures would never be implemented there.

While plans to distribute the memo itself among senior university staff appear to have been shelved, its essentially ill-founded premises, unhelpful tone and ham-fisted terminology are further evidence of the Government’s increasingly desperate attempts to foster better community relations from the top down.

The memo is ostensibly aimed at averting acts of terrorism, but confuses terrorism on the one hand, and radicalisation on the other. To say that universities sometimes radicalise people in their religious and political views is hardly controversial, but to consider this radicalisation in the context of Muslim communities a stepping stone to committing acts of violence implies a very dim view of students’ morality. Tumelty suggests that “indiscriminate monitoring of groups on campus assumes collective guilt”.

The accusatory tone of the document also has implications for student recruitment and retention. The numbers of Muslim students on many university courses is already unrepresentative of the wider social mix in many British cities – and Mackney fears that proposals like those in the memo, mixed with unhelpful comments from government ministers in recent weeks regarding issues such as the veil, could undermine the “enormous strides” made in recent years in university diversity and race relations.

The government’s approach of ethnic profiling, as evidenced by the ‘Asian-looking’ reference in the memo, has also come in for sharp criticism. Labony Choudhury, a student at Sheffield University interviewed by The Guardian, pointed out that “being Muslim has nothing to do with the colour of your skin, nor terrorism of any description. It’s like trying to define what a rapist looks like. Far too simplistic.”

By Graeme West

29th October 2006